Tryggere i en strålende hverdag

Her kommer sluttnotene med klikkbare lenker der det er relevant:

1. Stenecks bok fra 1984: Steneck, Nicholas: The Microwave Debate, MIT Press, 1984, ISBN 0-262-19230-6 Norsk utgivelse av boka fra 2022: Nicholas H. Steneck og Tom Butler, Debatten om mikrobølgene – fra jakten på svar til bransjeforsvar», 2022, Paradigmeskifte forlag, ISBN: 978-82-93235-41-5 Denne er utsolgt.
2. John 0. de Lorge, Operant Behavior and Colonic Temperature of Macaca mulatta Exposed to Radio Frequency Fields at and Above Resonant Frequencies, Bioelectromagnetics 5:233-246 (1984) PMID 6732879
   • https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.2250050211
3. John 0. de Lorge and Clayton S. Ezell, Observing Responses of Rats Exposed To 1.8 and 5.62 GHz Microwaves, Bioelectromagnetics 1 :183-198 (1980), PMID 7284023
   • https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.2250010208
4. «Flexnerrapporten». Søk etter «The Flexner Report» hvis du vil lese mer om denne. Den var finansiert av legemiddelindustrien og stoppet all undervisning av mennesker som ikke var hvite menn. Den støttet kun kjemisk og kirurgisk behandling av sykdom. Alt annet ble definert som kvakksalveri.
5. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 2020 May;118(5):483-524.
   • https://www.icnirp.org/en/publications/article/rf-guidelines-2020.html
6. Dokumenter som forklarer ICNIRPs vurderingsprinsipper: ICNIRP statement, General approach to protection against non-ionizing radiation, HEALTH PHYSICS 82(4):540‐548; 2002
   • https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-200204000-00017
   • Det ble laget en mer pedagogisk versjon av disse anbefalingene og utgitt som en WHO-publikasjon noen år senere: Framework for developing health-based electromagnetic field standards, World Health Organization, 2006, ISBN 92 4 159433 0
     • https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/43491/9241594330_eng.pdf
7. FHI 2012:3: Alexander, Jan m.fl.: Svake høyfrekvente elektromagnetiske felt – en vurdering av helserisiko og forvaltningspraksis, FHI-rapport 2012:3, Folkehelseinstituttet, 2012
   • https://www.fhi.no/globalassets/2012-3_mobilstraling
8. WHO IARC vurderingskriterier, siste versjon fra 2019: IARC, International Agency for Research on Cancer Preamble updated 2019;
   • https://monographs.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Preamble-2019.pdf
9. WHO IARC sitt dokument for vurdering av kreftfaren fra trådløs teknologi: Non-ionizing Radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans Volume 102, 2013, ISBN 13 978-92-832-1325-3
   • https://publications.iarc.fr/126
10. Health impact of 5G, Current state of knowledge of 5G-related carcinogenic and reproductive/developmental hazards as they emerge from epidemiological studies and in vivo experimental studies.
    • https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/690012/EPRS_STU(2021)690012_EN.pdf  (198 sider)
11. ICBE-EMF  2022: International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF). Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G. Environ Health 21, 92 (2022).
    • https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00900-9
12. Belyaev I, Dean A, Eger H, Hubmann G, Jandrisovits R, Kern M, Kundi M, Moshammer H, Lercher P, Müller K, Oberfeld G, Ohnsorge P, Pelzmann P, Scheingraber C, Thill R. 2016 EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses. Rev Environ Health, vol. 31, no. 3, 2016, pp. 363-397
    • https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2016-0011
13. Biointiative Working Group, David Carpenter and Cindy Sage (eds). 2012 Bioinitiative 2012: A rationale for biologically-based exposure standards for electromagnetic radiation.
    • http://www.bioinitiative.org
14. https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=17994
15. Nordhagen, Else K. and Flydal, Einar. «Self-referencing authorships behind the ICNIRP 2020 radiation protection guidelines» Reviews on Environmental Health, vol. 38, no. 3, 2023, pp. 531-546.
    • https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2022-0037  
    • Lenke til norsk oversettelse:
    • https://einarflydal.com/sdm_downloads/last-ned-nordhagen-flydal-2022-selvrefererende-forfatterskap-bak-icnirps-retningslinjer/
16. Stråleverninfo 03:02 utgitt av Direktoratet for Strålevern og Atomsikkerhet (DSA) 26. februar 2002, I dag ikke tilgjengelig hos DSA. En kopi av utgivelsen finner du her:  
    • https://einarflydal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Str%C3%A5leverninfo-03-2002.pdf
17. Informasjonsside om Gro Harlem Brundtlands el-overfølsomhet:
    • https://www.felo.no/min-kropp-har-reagert-pa-mobilstraling-i-25-ar/
18. Sonar 2019: New emerging risks insight, Swiss  Re, 2019,
    • https://www.swissre.com/institute/research/sonar/sonar2019/SONAR2019-off-the-leash.html
19. Nordhagen EK, Flydal E. WHO to build neglect of RF-EMF exposure hazards on flawed EHC reviews? Case study demonstrates how «no hazards» conclusion is drawn from data showing hazards. Rev Environ Health. 2024 Jul 10. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38981511.
    • https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2024-0089
20. Hardell L. World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health – a hard nut to crack, Reiew, International Journal Of Oncology 2017;51:405-41, PMID 28656257
    • https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4046
21. Leach, Victor & Weller, Steve & Mccredden, Julie. (2024). Wireless technology is an environmental stressor and there are engineering solutions that can reduce exposure. Conference paper, Australian Radiation Protection Conference 2023, published in the Journal and Newsletter of the Aaustralian radiation Protection Society Inc., May 2024, Vol, 41, No. 1, ISSN 1444-2752
    • https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381307966_Wireless_technology_is_an_environmental_stressor_and_there_are_engineering_solutions_that_can_reduce_exposure
22. Héroux, P.; Belyaev, I.; Chamberlin, K.; Dasdag, S.; De Salles, A.A.A.; Rodriguez, C.E.F.; Hardell, L.; Kelley, E.; Kesari, K.K.; Mallery-Blythe, E.; et al. Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 5398.
    • https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075398
23. Referanse til artikkelen i The Lancet som viser økning i EMF de siste 150 årene: Bandara, Priyanka & Carpenter, David. (2018). Planetary electromagnetic pollution: it is time to assess its impact. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2. e512-e514. PMID 30526934
    • https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(18)30221-3/fulltext
24. Artikkel som beskriver hvordan grenseverdiene henger sammen med kostander ved utbyggingen: Törnevik, Christer: Impact of EMF limits on 5G network roll-out, ITU Workshop on 5G, EMF & Health, Warsawa, December 5 2017,
    • https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/Workshops-and-Seminars/20171205/Documents/S3_Christer_Tornevik.pdf
25. En fagartikkel som viser problemene med å beregne stråledose fra 5G: Adda, Sara & Aureli, Tommaso & D’elia, Stefano & Franci, Daniele & Grillo, Enrico & Migliore, Marco & Pavoncello, Settimio & Schettino, Fulvio & Suman, Riccardo. (2020). A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation on the Measurement of the Electromagnetic Field Level Radiated by 5G Base Stations. IEEE Access. PP. 1-1.  
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998448
26. To artikler som diskuterer dette problemet:
    • Blackman C, Forge S. 5G Deployment: State of play in Europe, USA and Asia. In depth analysis requested by the ITRE committee. Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies, Directorate General for Internal Policies. 2019; PE 631.060.
      • https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2019/631060/IPOL_IDA(2019)631060_EN.pdf (34 sider)
    • Lin, James C. Incongruities in recently revised radiofrequency exposure guidelines and standards, Environmental Research, Volume 222, 2023, 115369, ISSN 0013-9351,
      • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.115369.
27. Artikkel om sykdommer knyttet til oksidativt stress (uten kobling til EMF):Kıran, Tugba & Otlu, Onder & Karabulut, Aysun. (2023). Oxidative stress and antioxidants in health and disease. LaboratoriumsMedizin. 47. 10.1515/labmed-2022-0108.
    • https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2022-0108
28. Kıvrak EG, Yurt KK, Kaplan AA, Alkan I, Altun G. Effects of electromagnetic fields exposure on the antioxidant defense system. J Microsc Ultrastruct. 2017 Oct-Dec;5(4):167-176. Epub 2017 Aug 2. PMID: 30023251; PMCID: PMC6025786.
    • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmau.2017.07.003
29. Strålsäkerhetsmyndigheten  (SSM) 2021:08 Recent Research on EMF and Health Risk
    • https://www.stralsakerhetsmyndigheten.se/publikationer/rapporter/stralskydd/2021/202108/
30. Frey AH, Feld SR, Frey B. Neural function and behavior: defining the relationship. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Feb 28;247:433-9. 975.tb36019.x. PMID: 46734.
    • https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb36019.x
31. Bonakdar M, Graybill PM, Davalos RV. A microfluidic model of the blood-brain barrier to study permeabilization by pulsed electric fields. RSC Adv. 2017;7(68):42811-42818. Epub 2017 Sep 5. PMID: 29308191; PMCID: PMC5753766, I artikkelen snakker de i hovedsak om elektriske pulser, ikke elektromagnetiske pulser., men nevner at man har funnet tilsvarende åpning av barrieren fra elektromagnetiske og henviser blant annet til artikkelen til Frey.
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7RA07603G
32. Phillips JL, Singh NP, Lai H. Electromagnetic fields and DNA damage. Pathophysiology. 2009 Aug;16(2-3):79-88. Epub 2009 Mar 4. PMID: 19264461.
    • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathophys.2008.11.005
33. Klitzing, L. (2023). The Problem of ICNIRP (Safety-Guidelines). British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research, Vol – 10(2). 283-286 
    • https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhmr.102.14402
34. Parizek D, Visnovcova N, et.al, Electromagnetic fields – do they pose a cardiovascular risk? Physiol Res. 2023 Apr 30;72(2):199-208. PMID: 37159854; PMCID: PMC10226401.
    • https://doi.org/10.33549/physiolres.934938
35. National Toxicology Program. Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies in Sprague Dawley (Hsd:Sprague Dawley SD) rats exposed to whole-body radio frequency radiation at a frequency (900 MHz) and modulations (GSM and CDMA) used by cell phones. Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 2018 Nov;(595):NTP-TR-595. PMID: 33562898; PMCID: PMC8039879.
    • https://doi.org/10.22427/ntp-tr-595
36. L. Falcioni, L. Bua, E. Tibaldi, M. Lauriola, L. De Angelis, et.al., Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environmental emission, Environmental Research, Volume 165, 2018, Pages 496-503, ISSN 0013-9351,
    • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.037
37. Lenke til prosjektet:
    • https://interphone.iarc.fr/
38. IARC sin informasjon om gruppe 2B:
    • https://www.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr208_E.pdf
39. For informasjon om forbudte stoffer i Norge, se Lovadata:
    • https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2013-04-08-391/KAPITTEL_7#KAPITTEL_7
40. Health impact of 5G – Current state of knowledge of 5G-related carcinogenic and reproductive/developmental hazards as they emerge from epidemiological studies and in vivo experimental studies, European Parliamentary Research Service, Scientific Foresight Unit (STOA), PE 690.012 – July 2021
    • https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/690012/EPRS_STU(2021)690012_EN.pdf (198 sider)
41. Miller AB, Morgan LL, Udasin I, Davis DL. Cancer epidemiology update, following the 2011 IARC evaluation of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (Monograph 102). Environ Res. 2018 Nov;167:673-683. Epub 2018 Sep 6. PMID: 30196934
    • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.043
42. Choi YJ, Moskowitz JM, Myung SK, Lee YR, Hong YC. Cellular Phone Use and Risk of Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 2;17(21):8079. PMID: 33147845; PMCID: PMC7663653.
    • https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218079
43. Du finner mange referanser til forskning på sammenhengen mellom svulster i spyttkjertlene og stråling, på en nettside på nettstedet til Dr. Joe M. Moskowitz:
    • https://www.saferemr.com/2016/12/cell-phone-use-and-salivary-gland-tumor.html
44. Artikkel fra 2024 hvor 5 forskere fra Malaisia og Kina har spurt 600 personer,hvorav 393 var brukere av trådløse øretelefoner: Zhou, N., Qin, W., Zhang, JJ. et al. Epidemiological exploration of the impact of bluetooth headset usage on thyroid nodules using Shapley additive explanations method. Sci Rep 14, 14354 (2024).
    • https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-63653-0
45. Yanjun Zhang, Yuanyuan Zhang, Ziliang Ye, Sisi Yang, Mengyi Liu, Qimeng Wu, Chun Zhou, Panpan He, Xiaoqin Gan, Xianhui Qin; Mobile Phone Use and Risks of Overall and 25 Site-Specific Cancers: A Prospective Study from the UK Biobank Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1 January 2024; 33 (1): 88–95.
    • https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0766
46. To artikler om økning i tykk- og endetarmskreft hos yngre:
    • Loomans-Kropp, Holli A., Umar, Asad, Increasing Incidence of Colorectal Cancer in Young Adults, Journal of Cancer Epidemiology, 2019, 9841295, 9 pages, 2019.
      • https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9841295
    • Davis, Devra & Pilarcik, Aaron & Miller, Anthony. (2021). Annals of Gastroenterology and Digestive Disorders Increased Generational Risk of Colon and Rectal Cancer in Recent Birth Cohorts under Age 40 -the Hypothetical Role of Radiofrequency Radiation from Cell Phones Somato Publications. 1-1010.
      • https://www.academia.edu/72804329/Annals_of_Gastroenterology_and_Digestive_Disorders?uc-sb-sw=37736815
47. Omtale av denne forskningen med posteret Li presenterte på konferansen ISEE2024 i Santiago:
    • https://microwavenews.com/news-center/new-clues-colorectal-cancer-among-young-adults
    • Dansk omtale av det samme: https://nejtil5g.dk/stigende-risiko-for-tyktarmskraeft-nar-mobilen-baeres-under-taljen/
48. Shih YW, Hung CS, Huang CC, Chou KR, Niu SF, Chan S, Tsai HT. The Association Between Smartphone Use and Breast Cancer Risk Among Taiwanese Women: A Case-Control Study. Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Oct 29;12:10799-10807. PMID: 33149685; PMCID: PMC7605549.
    • https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s267415
49. West JG, Kapoor NS, Liao SY, Chen JW, Bailey L, Nagourney RA. Multifocal Breast Cancer in Young Women with Prolonged Contact between Their Breasts and Their Cellular Phones. Case Rep Med. 2013;2013:354682. Epub 2013 Sep 18. PMID: 24151509; PMCID: PMC3789302.
    • https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/354682
50. Microwave News, Vol. XXVI No 4. «Radiation Research and The Cult of Negative Results»
    • https://www.jrseco.com/wp-content/uploads/mwn.7-06.RR.pdf
51. Gandhi OP, Morgan LL, de Salles AA, Han YY, Herberman RB, Davis DL. Exposure limits: the underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children. Electromagn Biol Med. 2012 Mar;31(1):34-51. Epub 2011 Oct 14. PMID: 21999884
    • https://doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2011.622827
52. Paul Héroux, The Collision between Wireless and Biology,
    • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42267,
    • for norsk omtale se https://einarflydal.com/2025/02/07/nar-utgangspunktet-er-som-galest-blir-stralevernet-gjerne-originalest/
53. Stewart W. (2000) ‘Mobile Phones and Health’: A report from the Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phones, The Stewart Report, UK,
    • https://www.emf-portal.org/en/article/11173
54. Kheifets L, Repacholi M, Saunders R, van Deventer E. The sensitivity of children to electromagnetic fields. Pediatrics. 2005 Aug;116(2):e303-13. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2541. PMID: 16061584.
55. Repacholi M, Saunders R, van Deventer E, Kheifets L. Guest editors’ introduction: is EMF a potential environmental risk for children? Bioelectromagnetics. 2005;Suppl 7:S2-4. PMID: 16217739.
    • https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20157
56. «Recommendations for Best Practices for Safe Technology in Schools», 56 sider.
    • https://www.sccma.org/Portals/19/LiveBlog/3697/SCCMA%20Best%20Practices%20for%20Safe%20Technology%20in%20Schools%20Recommendations%20%2021423.pdf
57. Bektas, Hava, Dasdag, Suleyman, Bektaş, Mehmet. (2020). Comparison of effects of 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and mobile phone exposure on human placenta and cord blood. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. 34. 154-162.
    • https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2020.1725639
58. Shanna H. Swan, Count Down, 2021, publisert av Scribner, ISBN: 978-1982113674
59. Hagai Levine, Niels Jørgensen, Anderson Martino-Andrade, Jaime Mendiola, Dan Weksler-Derri, Irina Mindlis, Rachel Pinotti, Shanna H Swan, 2017, Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis, Human Reproduction Update, Volume 23, Issue 6, November-December 2017, Pages 646–659,
    • https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmx022
60. Health impact of 5G – Current state of knowledge of 5G-related carcinogenic and reproductive/developmental hazards as they emerge from epidemiological studies and in vivo experimental studies, European Parliamentary Research Service, Scientific Foresight Unit (STOA), PE 690.012 – July 2021, 198 sider:
    • https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/690012/EPRS_STU(2021)690012_EN.pdf
61. Sungjoon Kim, Donghyun Han, Jiwoo Ryu, Kihun Kim, Yun Hak Kim, Effects of mobile phone usage on sperm quality – No time-dependent relationship on usage: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis, Environmental Research, Volume 202, 2021, 111784, ISSN 0013-9351,
    • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111784
    • Link til omtale: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/pusan-national-university-scientists-reveal-links-between-sperm-quality-and-cell-phone-use-301465885.html
62. Balmori A. Evidence for a health risk by RF on humans living around mobile phone base stations: From radiofrequency sickness to cancer. Environ Res. 2022 Nov;214(Pt 2):113851. Epub 2022 Jul 14. PMID: 35843283.
    • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113851
63. Pachuau, L., Pachuau, Z., Zothansiama, 2015. Comparisons of non specific health symptoms faced by inhabitants exposed to high and low power density from mobile phone tower radiation. Int. J. Recent Innov. Trends Comput. Commun. 3 (2), 94–98.
    • https://journals.dbuniversity.ac.in/ojs/index.php/JFAS/article/view/57/88
64. Belpomme D, Campagnac C, Irigaray P. Reliable disease biomarkers characterizing and identifying electrohypersensitivity and multiple chemical sensitivity as two etiopathogenic aspects of a unique pathological disorder. Rev Environ Health. 2015;30(4):251-71. PMID: 26613326.
    • https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2015-0027
65. Belpomme D, Irigaray P. Why electrohypersensitivity and related symptoms are caused by non-ionizing man-made electromagnetic fields: An overview and medical assessment. Environ Res. 2022 Sep;212(Pt A):113374. Epub 2022 May 7. PMID: 35537497
    • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113374
66. Stein Y, Udasin IG. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS, microwave syndrome) – Review of mechanisms. Environ Res. 2020 Jul;186:109445. Epub 2020 Mar 30. PMID: 32289567
    • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109445
67. Åpen bok – når livet løsner uten legen : min historie, Hilde Aalling Syvertsen, ISBN 9788269390506
    • https://hildeas.no/
68. Saravanamuttu, Sivani & Sudarsanam, D. (2013). Impacts of radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) from cell phone towers and wireless devices on biosystem and ecosystem—A review. Biology and Medicine. 4. 202-216.
69. Thill A, Cammaerts MC, Balmori A. Biological effects of electromagnetic fields on insects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Environ Health. 2023 Nov 23. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2023-0072.
    • https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2023-0072
70. Lázaro A u. a. (2016). “Electromagnetic radiation of mobile telecommunication antennas affects the abundance and composition of wild pollinators”. In: Journal of insect conservation 20.2, S. 315–324.
    • https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10841-016-9868-8
71. Cammaerts MC und Johansson O (2014). “Food collection and response to pheromones in an ant species exposed to electromagnetic radiation”. fr. In: Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 32.3, S. 315–332. PMID: 23320633,
    • https://doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2012.712877
72. Cammaerts, Marie-Claire, Philippe De Doncker u. a. (2012). “GSM 900 MHz radiation inhibits ants’ association between food sites and encountered cues”. en. In: Electromagnetic biology and medicine 31.2, S. 151–165, PMID: 22268919
    • https://doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2011.624661
73. Her er en artikkel som har sett nærmere på mulige årsaker til CCD: El-Seedi, H.R.; Ahmed, H.R.; El-Wahed, A.A.A.; Saeed, A.; Algethami, A.F.; Attia, N.F.; Guo, Z.; Musharraf, S.G.; Khatib, A.; Alsharif, S.M.; et al. Bee Stressors from an Immunological Perspective and Strategies to Improve Bee Health. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 199.
    • https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9050199
74. https://www.diagnose-funk.org/forschung/wirkungen-auf-tiere-pflanzen/insekten-bienen-und-voegel/wirkungen-auf-bienen
75. Engelsk video om hvordan EMF påvirker bier:
    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYcoZQntDZE
76. Santhosh Kumar, S. (2018). Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) in Honey Bees Caused by EMF Radiation. Bioinformation, 14(9), 421–424.
    • https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31223202/
77. International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Report detailing the exodus of species from the Mt. Nardi area of the Nightcap National Park World Heritage Area during a 15-year period (2000-2015.) Report prepared by: Mark Broomhall (naturalist / ethno-botanist) Kan hentes ned her:
    • https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Mt-Nardi-Wildlife-Report-to-UNESCO-FINAL
78. Alfonso Balmori 2005. Possible Effects of Electromagnetic Fields from Phone Masts on a Population of White Stork (Ciconia ciconia). Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine volume 24, Issue 2.
    • https://doi.org/10.1080/15368370500205472
79. Molina-Montenegro MA, Acuña-Rodríguez IS, Ballesteros GI, Baldelomar M, Torres-Díaz C, Broitman BR, Vázquez DP. Electromagnetic fields disrupt the pollination service by honeybees. Sci Adv. 2023 May 12;9(19):eadh1455. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adh1455. Epub 2023 May 12. PMID: 37172085; PMCID: PMC10181175.
    • https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh1455
80. Halil Baris Ozel, et.al., The effects of base station as an electromagnetic radiation source on flower and cone yield and germination percentage in Pinus brutia Ten, 2021, Biologia Futura,
    • https://doi.org/10.1007/s42977-021-00085-1
81. Turs Selga, Maija Selga, Response of Pinus sylvestris L. needles to electromagnetic fields. Cytological and ultrastructural aspects, Science of The Total Environment, Volume 180, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 65-73, ISSN 0048-9697,
    • https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(95)04921-5
82. Waldmann-Selsam C, Balmori-de la Puente A, Breunig H, Balmori A. Radiofrequency radiation injures trees around mobile phone base stations. Sci Total Environ. 2016 Dec 1;572:554-569. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.045. Epub 2016 Aug 24. PMID: 27552133.
    • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.045
    • Du finner en presentasjon av Waldmann-Selsam fra 2021 som har mange illustrerende bilder av hva de observerte:
      • https://einarflydal.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Wladmann-Selsam-2023-Tree_damage_caused_by_radiofrequency_radiation-1-1.pdf
83. Beaubois E, Girard S, Lallechere S, Davies E, Paladian F, Bonnet P, Ledoigt G, Vian A. Intercellular communication in plants: evidence for two rapidly transmitted systemic signals generated in response to electromagnetic field stimulation in tomato. Plant Cell Environ. 2007 Jul;30(7):834-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01669.x. PMID: 17547655
84. Chandni Upadhyaya, Trushit Upadhyaya, Ishita Patel, Attributes of non-ionizing radiation of 1800 MHz frequency on plant health and antioxidant content of Tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum) plants, Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, Volume 15, Issue 1, 2022, Pages 54-68, ISSN 1687-8507,
    • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2022.02.001
85. Katie Haggerty 2010. Adverse Influence of Radio Frequency Background on Trembling Aspen Seedlings: Preliminary Observations. International Journal of Forestry Research volume 2010, 836278.
    • https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/836278
86. Sophia Ruan Rushée, EMF Detox Workbook, ISBN 978-0991140145
87. Milham, Samuel: Dirty Electricity – Electrification and the Diseases of Civilization, iUniverse, 2012, ISBN 978-1938908187
88. Samuel Milham and L. Lloyd Morgan: A New Electromagnetic Exposure Metric: High Frequency Voltage Transients Associated With Increased Cancer Incidence in Teachers in a California School
    • https://www.stetzerelectric.com/wp-content/uploads/Milham-Morgan-2008.pdf